Prior Art Invalidity

(Including: Anticipation; Printed Publications; Prior Inventorship; Public Use Bar; On-sale Bar)

CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appeal No. 2022-1827 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 12, 2024). Before Reyna, Mayer, and Cunningham. Appealed from the ITC. (On-Sale Bar)

CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION事件、上訴番号 2022-1827 (CAFC、2024年8月12日)。Reyna裁判官、Mayer裁判官、Cunningham裁判官による審理。ITCの判決を不服としての上訴。(販売による特許性の喪失)

MINERVA SURGICAL, INC. v. HOLOGIC, INC., Appeal No. 2021-2246 (Fed. Cir. February 15, 2023). Before Prost, Reyna, and Stoll. Appealed from D. Del. (Judge Bataillon). (Public Use Bar)

MINERVA SURGICAL, INC. v. HOLOGIC, INC.事件、上訴番号 2021-2246 (CAFC、2023年2月15日)。 Prost裁判官、Reyna裁判官、Stoll裁判官による審理。デラウエア州地区地方裁判所(Bataillon裁判官)の判決を不服としての上訴。(公然使用による新規性の喪失)

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., Appeal No. 21-2121 (Fed. Cir. September 29, 2022). Before Lourie, Reyna, and Stoll. Appealed from PTAB. (Anticipation/Obviousness)

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.事件、上訴番号 21-2121 (CAFC、2022年9月29日)。 Lourie裁判官、Reyna裁判官、Stoll裁判官による審理。PTABの決定を不服としての上訴。(同一性/自明性)

SUNOCO PARTNERS MARKETING & TERMINALS L.P. v. U.S. VENTURE, INC., Appeal No. 2020-1641 (Fed. Cir. April 29, 2022). Before Prost, Reyna, and Stoll. Appealed from N.D. Ill. (Judge Pallmeyer). (On-Sale Bar)

SUNOCO PARTNERS MARKETING & TERMINALS L.P. v. U.S. VENTURE, INC.事件、上訴番号 2020-1641 (CAFC、2022年4月29日)。Prost裁判官、Reyna裁判官、Stoll裁判官による審理。イリノイ州北部地区地方裁判所(Pallmeyer裁判官)の判決を不服としての上訴。(販売による新規性の喪失)

BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY v. BAXTER CORPORATION ENGLEWOOD, Appeal No. 2020-1937 (Fed. Cir. May 28, 2021). Before Prost, Clevenger, and Dyk. Appealed from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. (Obviousness; Prior Art)

BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY v. BAXTER CORPORATION ENGLEWOOD事件、上訴番号2020-1937 (CAFC、2021年5月28日)。Prost裁判官、Clevenger裁判官、Dyk裁判官による審理。PTABの決定を不服としての上訴。 (自明性; 先行技術) Paige Soon氏による要約

M & K HOLDINGS INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Appeal No. 2020-1160 (Fed. Cir. February 1, 2021). Before Moore, Bryson, and Chen. Appealed from Patent Trial and Appeal Board. (§102 Printed Publications – Public Accessibility)

M & K HOLDINGS INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.事件、上訴番号2020-1160 (CAFC、2021年2月1日)。Moore裁判官、Bryson裁判官、Chen裁判官による審理。PTABの決定を不服としての上訴。(§102に基づく刊行物 – 公共アクセスの可能性)

VIDSTREAM LLC v. TWITTER, INC., Appeal Nos. 2019-1734 and 2019-1735 (Fed. Cir. November 25, 2020). Before Newman, O’Malley, and Taranto. Appealed from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. (Prior Art)

VIDSTREAM LLC v. TWITTER, INC.事件、上訴番号2019-1734および2019-1735(CAFC、2020年11月25日)。Newman裁判官、O’Malley裁判官、Taranto裁判官による審理。PTABの判決を不服としての上訴。(先行技術)

BASF CORP. v. SNF HOLDING CO., Appeal No. 2019-1243 (Fed. Cir. April 8, 2020). Before Lourie, Moore and Chen. Appealed from S.D. Cal. (Judge Baker). (§102(b) On-Sale Bar)

BASF CORP. v. SNF HOLDING CO.事件、上訴番号2019-1243(CAFC、2020年4月8日)。Lourie裁判官、Moore裁判官、Chen裁判官による審理。カリフォルニア州南部地区地方裁判所(Baker裁判官)の判決を不服としての上訴。(§102(b)に基づく販売による特許性の喪失)

ATEN INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. v. UNICLASS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Appeal No. 2018-1606 (Fed. Cir. August 6, 2019). Before Moore, Wallach, and Taranto. Appealed from C.D. Cal. (Judge Guilford). (Prior Art and Expert Testimony)

ATEN INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD. v. UNICLASS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.事件、上訴番号2018-1606 (CAFC、2019年8月6日)。 Moore裁判官、 Wallach裁判官、Taranto裁判官による審理。カリフォルニア州中央地区地方裁判所(Guilford裁判官)の判決を不服としての上訴。(先行技術と専門家証言)

DUNCAN PARKING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. IPS GROUP, INC., Appeals Nos. 2018‑1205 and 2018‑1360 (Fed. Cir. January 31, 2019). Before Lourie, Dyk, and Taranto. Appealed from the PTAB and from S.D. Cal. (Judge Bencivengo). (Anticipation)

ACCELERATION BAY, LLC v. ACTIVISION BLIZZARD INC., Appeal No. 2017-2084 (Fed. Cir. November 6, 2018) (Prost, Moore, and Reyna) Appealed from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Preamble And Printed Publications)

ACCELERATION BAY, LLC v. ACTIVISION BLIZZARD INC.事件、上訴番号2017-2084(CAFC、2018年11月6日) (Prost裁判官、Moore裁判官、Reyna裁判官による審理) 米国特許商標庁の決定を不服としての上訴。(序文と印刷刊行物)

POLARA ENGINEERING INC. v. CAMPBELL CO., Appeal Nos. 2017-1974, -2033 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 10, 2018). Before Lourie, Dyk, and Hughes. Appealed from C.D. Cal. (Judge McCormick). (Public Use)

POLARA ENGINEERING INC. v. CAMPBELL CO.事件、上訴番号2017-1974、-2033(連邦巡回、2018年7月10日)。Lourie裁判官、 Dyk裁判官、Hughes裁判官による審理。カリフォルニア州中央地区地方裁判所(McCormick裁判官)の判決を不服としての上訴。(公然使用)

MEDTRONIC, INC. v. BARRY, Appeal No. 2017-1169 (Fed. Cir. June 11, 2018) (Taranto, Plager, and Chen). Appealed from the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board. (Obviousness and Printed Publications)

MEDTRONIC, INC. v. BARRY事件、上訴番号2017-1169(CAFC、2018年6月11日) (Taranto裁判官、Plager裁判官、Chen裁判官による審理) 米国特許審判部(PTAB)の決定を不服としての上訴。自明性と印刷刊行物

MEDTRONIC, INC. v. BARRY, Appeal Nos. 2017-1169 & 2017-1170 (Fed. Cir. June 11, 2018). Before Taranto, Plager, and Chen. Appealed from Patent Trial and Appeal Board. (Prior Art; Printed Publications)

ERICSSON, INC. v. INTELLECTUAL VENTURES LLC, Appeal No. 2016-1671 (Fed. Cir. May 29, 2018). Before Prost, Newman, and Wallach. Appealed from the PTAB. (Expert Opinion, Anticipation)

THE MEDICINES CO. v. HOSPIRA, INC., Appeal No. 14-1469 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 6, 2018). Before Dyk, Wallach, and Hughes. Appealed from D. Del. (Judge Andrews). (§102(b) On-Sale Bar)

THE MEDICINES CO. v. HOSPIRA, INC.事件、上訴番号14-1469(CAFC、2018年2月6日)。Dyk裁判官、Wallach裁判官、Hughes裁判官による審理。ディラウエア地区地方裁判所(Andrews裁判官)の判決を不服としての上訴。(§102(b)に基づく販売による特許性の喪失)

MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. BISCOTTI, INC., Appeal No. 2016-2080, 2082, 2083 (Fed. Cir. December 28, 2017). Before Newman, O’Malley, and Reyna. Appealed from PTAB. (Anticipation)

HOMELAND HOUSEWARES, LLC v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, Appeal No. 2016-1511 (Fed. Cir. August 4, 2017). Before Prost, Newman, and Dyk. Appealed from PTAB. (Anticipation)

HELSINN HEALTHCARE S.A. v. TEVA PHARM. USA, INC., Appeal Nos. 2016-1284, -1787 (Fed. Cir. May 1, 2017). Before Dyk, Mayer, O’Malley. Appealed from D.N.J. (Judge Cooper). (On-Sale Bar)

IN RE CHUDIK, Appeal No. 2016-1817 (Fed. Cir. March 27, 2017). Before Dyk, Reyna, and Stoll. Appealed from PTAB. (Anticipation)

U.S. WATER SERVICES, INC. v. NOVOZYMES A/S, Appeal Nos. 2015-1950, 1967 (Fed. Cir. December 15, 2016). Before Wallach, Hughes, and Stoll. Appealed from W.D. Wis. (Judge Peterson). (Invalidity; Inequitable Conduct)

MERCK v. HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Appeal Nos. 2015-2063, -2064 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2016). Before Dyk, Mayer, Hughes. Appealed from D. Del. (Judge Andrews). (§102(b) On-Sale Bar)

TRANSWEB, LLC v. 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO., Appeal No. 2014-1646 (Fed. Cir. February 10, 2016). Before Wallach, Bryson, and Hughes. Appealed from D.N.J. (Judge Hochberg). (Prior Use Corroboration)

PURDUE PHARMA L.P. v. EPIC PHARMA, LLC, Appeal Nos. 2014-1294, etc. (Fed. Cir. Feb. 1, 2016). Before Prost, Reyna and Stark (D. Del., by designation). Appealed from S.D.N.Y. (Judge Stein). (Anticipation; Obviousness: Problem Source Discovery)

DYNAMIC DRINKWARE, LLC v. NATIONAL GRAPHICS, INC., Appeal No. 2015-1214 (Fed. Cir. September 4, 2015). Before Lourie, Bryson, and O’Malley. Appealed from Patent Trial and Appeal Board. (Anticipation)

THE MEDICINES COMPANY v. HOSPIRA, INC., Appeal Nos. 2014-1469, -1504 (Fed. Cir. July 2, 2015). Before Dyk, Wallach and Hughes. Appealed from D. Del. (Judge Andrews). (On-Sale Bar)

IN RE IMES, Appeal No. 2014-1206 (Fed. Cir. January 29, 2015). Before Lourie, Moore, and Chen. Appealed from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). (Anticipation and Obviousness)

DELANO FARMS v. THE CALIFORNIA GRAPE COMMISSION, Appeal No. 2014-1030 (Fed. Cir. January 9, 2015). Before Prost, Bryson and Hughes. Appealed from E.D. Cal. (Judge Haddon). (Public Use)

FLEMING v. ESCORT INC., Appeal No. 2014-1331, -1371 (Fed. Cir. December 24, 2014). Before Taranto, Hughes and Bryson. Appealed from the D. Idaho (Judge Winmill). (Prior Invention/Reissue)

DDR HOLDINGS, LLC. v. HOTELS.COM, L.P., Appeal No. 2013-1505 (Fed. Cir. December 5, 2014). Before Wallach, Mayer and Chen. Appealed from E.D. Tex. (Judge Gilstrap). (Anticipation; Indefiniteness; Patent Eligible Subject Matter)

SUFFOLK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC., v. AOL, INC & GOOGLE, INC, Appeal No. 2013-1392 (Fed Cir. May 27, 2014). Before Rader, Prost, and Chen. Appealed from E.D. Virginia (Judge Ellis). (Claim Construction–Printed Publication)

IN RE RAMBUS, INC., Appeal No. 2013-1192 (Fed. Cir. June 4, 2014). Before Rader, Moore and Reyna. Appealed from Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). (Anticipation)

SOLVAY S.A. v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appeal No. 2012-1660 (Fed. Cir. February 12, 2014). Before Rader, Newman, and Dyk. Appealed from D. Del. (Judge Robinson). (§102(g)(2) Prior Art)

IN RE ENHANCED SECURITY RESEARCH, LLC Appeal No. 2013-1114 (Fed. Cir. January 13, 2014). Before Dyk, O’Malley, and Taranto. Appealed from PTAB. (Obviousness; Prior Art)